Skip to content

Offering

For a health system rather than a single hospital.

A state or central health department administers a population across facilities, and at that scale the unit of administration is the record rather than the building.

The incumbent is free, and that is the first question.

A department already runs facility software across much of its estate, and it pays no licence for it.

eHospital from the National Informatics Centre runs on the government cloud. eSushrut from the Centre for Development of Advanced Computing runs in the institutes and in state-wide programmes, and a lighter edition of it now reaches small providers. Both are aligned to the national digital health mission, both are already installed, and neither costs a facility anything. A supplier who cannot say what that leaves a department holding has not understood what the department is being asked to do.

So the boundary, stated plainly. If the requirement is software for a building, the free option is a rational choice and we will say so in the room. The case for Pensieve begins where the unit of administration stops being the building: one person across every facility in the estate, one access decision over all of it with a record of every access that can be read months later, and scheme, quality and statutory evidence produced by the work rather than compiled as a return.

A facility system administers a facility. It is not a criticism of one to observe that a department is not a facility.

What a department is left holding

One person, or one instance per facility.

  • A deployment per facility produces a patient per facility. Someone seen at a community health centre, referred to a district hospital and operated on at a medical college is three records, and no one holds the join.One tenant across the estate and one record per person inside it, with each facility working in its own modelled structure.Atlas
  • The department asks for a return, the facility fills it in, and what reaches the state is a description of what somebody remembered at the end of a month.The operating picture is computed from the same record the facility is writing to, and every figure opens to the events that produced it.Falcon

The claim is the department’s own money.

  • Package rate billing is not itemised billing. A claim is priced against a national procedure master, adjusted for where the facility sits and what quality certificate it holds, and submitted through an envelope no private administrator uses.Vault prices one clinical event against every rate book that applies to it and produces each payer’s claim from that same event.Vault
  • The routine loss is not outright rejection. It is line items removed from an otherwise approved claim, answered by a desk that has to reassemble the document pack under a clock.A deduction is a state of the claim rather than a new one, and the pack that answers it is assembled from the visit the treatment is already recorded on.VaultFalcon

Identity is where a public scheme leaks.

  • A beneficiary identity is created at a counter, under time pressure, by the least experienced person in the building, thousands of times a day. Everything downstream inherits it.Registration opens a visit against one identity, and the national health account is linked at that point where the patient chooses to, never as a mandatory field that blocks treatment.Gate
  • The same patient shown as admitted at two institutions at once is not a clinical error. It is a record integrity failure that only appears when somebody audits both institutions at the same time.A second admission opened while the first is still open is visible on the record itself rather than discovered afterwards by an auditor.GateAtlas

Evidence is assembled in the weeks before an assessment.

  • Incident registers, indicator returns, infection rates, credentialing files, calibration logs and committee minutes are reconstructed by a quality cell out of the departments that were supposed to be keeping them.Vigil reads the evidence out of the work as it happens, so accreditation readiness is a standing state rather than a project with a deadline.Vigil
  • The statutory registers carry criminal liability and live in physical books: prenatal diagnostics, medico-legal cases, the narcotics balance, the biomedical waste log.Glyph carries them as structured forms that lock on completion and keep a version history, so the register and the record are the same record.Glyph

The public record

What is already documented, by people who are not us

Four findings from Indian government records and from the peer-reviewed literature. None of them is a Pensieve result, and each links to its primary source.

  1. India’s national auditor found 749,820 scheme beneficiaries registered against one mobile number, and 78,396 instances of a single patient recorded as admitted to more than one hospital at the same time.Comptroller and Auditor General of India, Report No. 11 of 2023. Every finding in it is an identity failure rather than a clinical one.
  2. In a 2025 study of the national and state schemes in one state, settlement ran from three months to a year against a thirty day guideline, with individual hospitals carrying two to three crore rupees pending.Marathe S, Hunter BM, Chakravarthi I, et al. BMC Health Services Research, 2025. Claims stalled at the account verification stage, and pre-authorisation breached its own guideline.
  3. The national health authority pays an approved hospital 10 percent above the base package rate while it holds entry level accreditation, and 15 percent while it holds full accreditation.National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Providers, quality certification programme. A published tariff rule, and several states now condition empanelment on it.
  4. A registered facility earns a published incentive for each digitised record it links above a monthly threshold, and separately for each insurance claim transacted through the national exchange.National Health Authority, financial incentive policy under the digital health incentive scheme. A published rate rather than an outcome.

The money

One clinical event, and every rate book that applies to it

THE WORKPAYER ROUTESOne clinicaleventCash and depositInsurer or TPANational schemeState schemeTHE RATE THAT APPLIES
A facility bills a cash counter, a corporate book, an insurer or its administrator, a national scheme on its own portal, and a state scheme that behaves differently in every state. The event is one. What changes is the rate that applies to it and the envelope it leaves in.

Scheme billing, in the shape India actually has.

A package rate is not a price list

A package rate is a fixed amount for a procedure drawn from a national master, modified by where the facility sits and by the quality certificate it holds, and reserved or blocked for certain provider types. The quality modifier alone is 10 percent at entry level and 15 percent at full accreditation. Source 23 Vault applies the rate book that applies to the event, rather than asking a clerk to remember which one it was.

Vault

The state layer is where imported products fail

A state scheme may adjudicate through the national system, may top it up, or may run its own empanelment and its own portal entirely. Each is a payer with its own rate book and its own route out, configured in the platform and carried over the same outbound bridge as every other external connection. The routing is data, so a second state is a configuration rather than a version of the product.

Interoperability

Three more rate schedules are in routine use

The central government health scheme, the ex-servicemen scheme and the employees’ insurance scheme each carry their own package master and their own claim route, and a district hospital meets all of them in the same week as it meets cash and a corporate book. One clinical event, priced against each of them, from the same record.

The incentives are administrative rather than clinical

A facility on the national registry earns a published incentive for each digitised record it links above a monthly threshold, and for each claim transacted through the national exchange. Source 25 Pensieve is built to participate in both. Whether a given facility qualifies is the department’s determination rather than ours, and we will not price a proposal on it.

Readiness for the national mission

Criteria a department can publish before the tender, including against us

Evaluation criteria for a health department procuring facility or estate software
CriterionWhat to require in the document
One record across facilitiesShow one person treated at three facilities as one record with one history, and show what a fourth facility sees when that person arrives there.
Access, provable afterwardsRequire a per-patient access list, a per-user access lookup and a complete access log, and require that the log is written by the same transaction as the change it describes.
Scheme and payer coverageRequire one clinical event priced against the national scheme, the state scheme and at least two administrators, and require the deduction and resubmission loop to be demonstrated rather than described.
Registry and exchange participationRequire facility and professional registry linkage, account creation at registration, and record sharing under the patient’s consent, with a refusal to link never blocking care.
What is already installedRequire a system inventory per facility and a written statement of which systems are read, which are written to, and which are replaced.
Residency and processingRequire the region named, the processing terms in a signed addendum, and the subprocessor list published and kept current rather than supplied on request.
ExitRequire the export formats, the timetable and the removal sequence in the contract, and require them to be tested during the term rather than described at the end of it.
ContinuityRequire the terms on which the department keeps operating the system if the supplier does not. Put the question to every bidder in the same words and compare the answers.

Publish the criteria before the demonstrations rather than after them. A department that states in advance what it will require gets answers it can compare; one that does not gets brochures. We would rather be measured against this list than presented alongside it.

Lock-in.

The record belongs to the institution

Under India’s data protection law the institution is the data fiduciary and Pensieve is the processor. The processing addendum binds us to act on the institution’s documented instructions except where the law requires otherwise, and nothing in the software is built as though the record were ours.

Human rights

Portability is a property of the architecture

Pensieve reads HL7 v2, FHIR R4 and DICOM, which is exactly why it can write them. An export leaves on the standards the data arrived on rather than as a dump a successor supplier has to reverse engineer, and it stays available for the whole term rather than becoming a negotiation at the end of one.

The removal sequence is already published

How Pensieve comes out is written down in the same detail as how it goes in. A department that cannot read the exit before it signs is being asked to take the exit on trust, and that is the position this page exists to refuse.

Deployment, and how it is removed

Nothing is ripped out to make room

The bridge lets Pensieve run beside what a facility already has, over one outbound connection, speaking the protocols those systems already speak. Where an installed system is doing its job it keeps doing it, and Pensieve reads it.

The bridge

Privacy, and who is allowed to look.

Residency is the smaller half

The record sits on Google Cloud in region asia-south1, in India, co-located with the database. For a department reasoning about the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, the answer to where the data lives has to be a region rather than a reassurance. It is also the easy half of the question.

The larger half is basis

The department has to be able to prove, afterwards, on what basis each access happened. Consent is a modelled object the access check reads on every read and every write, an admission is the other half of that decision, and both a grant and a withdrawal are audited inside the transaction that made them. An administrator can see who currently holds access to one patient, everything one member of staff can reach, and what a proposed permission change would do before it is made.

How access is decided

Nothing of ours reaches into a facility network

One binary inside the estate opens one outbound, mutually authenticated connection. No inbound port is opened at any facility and no listener is exposed, which is what a state network team is actually being asked to approve. Machine traffic queues in a local outbox through an outage and delivers on reconnect.

What we do not claim

We hold no data protection certificate, because there is none to hold, and using Pensieve does not by itself make an institution compliant with anything. Compliance is a property of how the institution operates. What we publish is the mechanism and the documents that bind us to it: the security addendum, the data residency statement and the processing addendum, each versioned, dated and hashed.

Trust Center

Powerful. Responsible. Pensieve.

Get started